Course syllabus - Business Analysis
Scope
7.5 credits
Course code
FOA157
Valid from
Spring semester 2020
Education level
First cycle
Progressive Specialisation
G1F (First cycle, has less than 60 credits in first-cycle course/s as entry requirements).
Main area(s)
Business Administration
School
School of Business, Society and Engineering
Ratified
2019-06-28
Status
This syllabus is not current and will not be given any more
Literature lists
Course literature is preliminary up to 8 weeks before course start. Course literature can be valid over several semesters.
-
Literature
A practical guide to focus-group research
Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 30(3), 463-475. DOI: 10.1080/03098260600927575, 2006
Management Accounting
McGraw-Hill Education: Berkshire, 2013
Business analysis techniques: 99 essential tools for success
(2nd ed.), 2014
How to Choose the right Forecasting Technique
Harvard business review, 49(4), 45, (1971)
Basics of Applied Analysis
Working paper, 2020
A unified foundation for business analytics
Decision Support Systems, 64, 2014
Maps of Bounded Rationality: A Perspective on Intuitive Judgment and Choice
Prize Lecture, 2002
URL: PDF at:
Social network analysis: An introduction
The SAGE handbook of social network analysis, 11., 2014
Digital Data Streams: Creating Value from the Real-Time Flow of Big Data
California Management Review, 58(3), 525., 2016
URL: Link
Making management decisions: The role of intuition and emotion
Academy of Management Perspectives, 1(1), 57-64, 1987
URL: Link
Two decades of recommender systems at Amazon. com
Ieee internet computing, 21(3), 12-18, 2017
Objectives
The course gives a basic understanding of methods and tools for business analysis, as well as the needs and effects of such analyses. Through theory as well as practical assignments, different types of business relevant analysis are introduced, thereby training the analytical skills of the student to evaluate and understand markets and businesses.
Learning outcomes
After completion of the course the student should be able to:
1. Identify and formulate analytical possibilities
2. Develop analytical inquires suitable for analysis
3. Identify and exemplify analytical assumptions
4. Compare and select appropriate analytic method
5. Plan and execute different types of analysis
6. Reflect upon analyses' strengths and weaknesses
7. Be able to discuss and reflect on the relevance and applicability of the analysis for decision making.
Course content
This course dedicates its attention towards predicative analyses that serve as platforms for decision making. The course therefore includes several analytical models, methods and tools. The course includes sessions that develop students' ability to both formulate analytical inquires and select between analytical possibilities. A central aspect of the content is exercises that improve students' ability to critical assess assumptions, validity, limitations, and shortcomings. The content in this course is therefore build upon both practical and theoretical parts which together stimulate the development of the students' analytical capabilities.
Tuition
Lectures, exercises, and seminars
Specific requirements
Business 30 credits, at least 22.5 credits must be completed at the beginning of the course. In addition English course B/English course 6 is required.
Examination
Project (PRO1), 1,5 credit, grades Excellent (A), Very good (B), Good (C), Satisfactory (D), Sufficient (E), Insufficient, complementary work possible (Fx), Insufficient (F) (learning outcome 5)
Seminar (SEM1), 2 credits, grades Excellent (A), Very good (B), Good (C), Satisfactory (D), Sufficient (E), Insufficient, complementary work possible (Fx), Insufficient (F) (learning outcomes 1-7)
Examination (TEN1), 3 credits, grades Excellent (A), Very good (B), Good (C), Satisfactory (D), Sufficient (E), Insufficient, complementary work possible (Fx), Insufficient (F) learning outcomes1-7)
Assignment (INL1), 1 credit, grades Excellent (A), Very good (B), Good (C), Satisfactory (D), Sufficient (E), Insufficient, complementary work possible (Fx), Insufficient (F) (learning outcomel 5)
A student who has a certificate from MDU regarding a disability has the opportunity to submit a request for supportive measures during written examinations or other forms of examination, in accordance with the Rules and Regulations for Examinations at First-cycle and Second-cycle Level at Mälardalen University (2020/1655). It is the examiner who takes decisions on any supportive measures, based on what kind of certificate is issued, and in that case which measures are to be applied.
Suspicions of attempting to deceive in examinations (cheating) are reported to the Vice-Chancellor, in accordance with the Higher Education Ordinance, and are examined by the University’s Disciplinary Board. If the Disciplinary Board considers the student to be guilty of a disciplinary offence, the Board will take a decision on disciplinary action, which will be a warning or suspension.
Grade
Excellent, Very good, Good, Satisfactory, Sufficient, Insufficient, complementary work possible, Insufficient
Interim Regulations and Other Regulations
Overlap with FOA149.