Course syllabus - Technology and Society
Scope
7.5 credits
Course code
IEO101
Valid from
Autumn semester 2017
Education level
First cycle
Progressive Specialisation
G1N (First cycle, has only upper-secondary level entry requirements)
School
School of Business, Society and Engineering
Ratified
2017-01-27
Literature lists
Course literature is preliminary up to 8 weeks before course start. Course literature can be valid over several semesters.
-
Books
Lecture 1
Sorting things out: classification and its consequences
pp. 33-50.
ISBN: 0262024616
Books
Lecture 2
A typology of intermediary organizations and their impact on sustainability transition policies. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 29
pp. 100-113
Books
Lecture 3
Infrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design. Social Studies of Science, 43(2)
pp 241-264
Handbook of new media: social shaping and social consequences of ICTs
pp. 151-162
ISBN: 9781446211304
Books
Lecture 4
Researching Internet Governance: Methods, Frameworks, Futures
Bitcoin and beyond: cryptocurrencies, blockchains, and global governance
pp.133-156, Musiani, F., Mallard, A. and Méadel, C. (2017). Governing What Wasn't Meant To Be Governed: A Controversy-Based Approach to the Study of Bitcoin Governance
ISBN: 9780415792141
Books
Lecture 5
An interactive perspective on the use of science (Ch.2). In: Launberg, A. Creating value from science. Interaction between academia, business and healthcare in the Uppsala PET Centre case. Ph.D. thesis
URL: Available at:
Books
Lecture 6
Otherwise engaged. Journal of Cultural Economy, 1(1)
pp. 79-92
When a Seawall Is Visible: Infrastructure and Obstruction in Post-tsunami Reconstruction in Japan. Science as Culture, 25(1)
pp. 23-43
Books
Lecture 6
The trojan door: Organizations, work, and the open black box. Systems Practice, 5 (4)
pp. 395-410
Objectives
The purpose of this course is to introduce scientific frameworks for assessing the relationship between technological development and societal processes, frameworks that the students apply in several ways during the course in order to learn how to design and develop technologies that respond to societal needs.
Learning outcomes
After completed course the student shall be able to:
1. describe conditions that favour technological innovation.
2. map the requirements on technology posed by the main actors involved in technological processes.
3. model infrastructures that handle the complexity and challenges of technological change at different levels.
4. contribute to designing future technological scenarios by evaluating the feasibility of assigned technological solutions.
5. critically evaluate how technology is used to solve societal challenges by selecting relevant scientific literature and comparing different scientific paradigms.
6. critically assess the politics and policy of technological innovation and change.
Course content
The students work with different group and individual assignments and are supported by lectures and seminars that introduce and discuss concepts and tools for working with technological development. The students produce not only own suggestions for models and solutions in the group and individual assignments, but also perform critical evaluations of such suggestions.
Specific requirements
Physics B, Chemistry A, Mathematics D or Physics 2, Chemistry 1, Mathematics 4.
Examination
Assignment (INL1), 1 credit, grade Pass (G) [learning outcome 1]
Group assignment (GRU1), 1,5 credits, grade Pass (G) [learning outcomes 2, 3]
Group assignment (GRU2), 1 credit, grade Pass (G) [learning outcome 4]
Assignment (INL4), 2 credits, grades 3, 4 or 5 [learning outcome 5]
Assignment (INL3), 2 credits, grade Pass (G) [learning outcome 6]
A student who has a certificate from MDU regarding a disability has the opportunity to submit a request for supportive measures during written examinations or other forms of examination, in accordance with the Rules and Regulations for Examinations at First-cycle and Second-cycle Level at Mälardalen University (2020/1655). It is the examiner who takes decisions on any supportive measures, based on what kind of certificate is issued, and in that case which measures are to be applied.
Suspicions of attempting to deceive in examinations (cheating) are reported to the Vice-Chancellor, in accordance with the Higher Education Ordinance, and are examined by the University’s Disciplinary Board. If the Disciplinary Board considers the student to be guilty of a disciplinary offence, the Board will take a decision on disciplinary action, which will be a warning or suspension.
Grade
Grading scale: 5, 4, 3